Bemused vs Amused: Do you know the difference?

discussion posts

This is such a huge pet peeve of mine. Authors use the word “bemused” when they really mean “amused” all. the. TIME. Let’s review definitions, shall we?

amused definition

bemused definition

 

 

 

 

I read a book recently where the author used the word bemused TWICE. Now, I’ll say giving the author the benefit of the doubt, bemused could hypothetically have fit the situation. However, in the context of the story, amused would have made much more sense. And here I am, as a reader, wondering how nobody knows the difference between these two words! Not the author, not the editor, not anyone else who read this book before it got published.

But to be completely transparent with you, when I looked up bemused on Dictionary.com, this is something else that popped up:

The verb bemuse (usually as the adjective bemused)is similar in sound to amuse, and has in fact taken on the meaning “to cause to be mildly amused.” Many usage experts and traditionalists consider this a misuse of bemuse, pointing out that its proper meaning is “to bewilder or confuse.” However, the history and use of bemuse has shown that is meaning is often ambiguous. It’s often the case that one’s feelings are a combination of bewilderment and amusement: Their customs bemuse most Americans. Even when it clearly means “to bewilder or confuse,” bemuse usually retains a lighthearted tone: one would not typically say: I was bemused by his motive for the murder.

So apparently, because everyone keeps using this word wrong, it’s starting to mean what everyone has been using it to mean. Isn’t that weird? It’s just so…frustrating to me, because it’s wrong! Just because people keep getting a math answer wrong doesn’t change what the answer actually is, right?

I was telling my husband about this strange phenomenon and he told me that the same thing happens with travesty vs tragedy. A lot of people use the word travesty to mean an even bigger tragedy, when in reality it means: “a false, absurd, or distorted representation of something.”

Anyway, there’s my rant for the day. Are there any words that you’ve noticed authors (or other people) consistently get wrong? Why do you think editors don’t catch that kind of thing?

11 thoughts on “Bemused vs Amused: Do you know the difference?

  1. I’ve never seen this in a book before, though it could be an editor and not the author? I do see an awful lot of comma splices being published, though, and I don’t know why no one seems to catch them.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This is hilarious, because I misused this word for years because I’d only seen it in books, with authors using it wrong! It doesn’t really bug me, because I think it’s kind of taken on new meaning because of that, but it is both AMUSING and BEMUSING (hehe) to observe. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Haha so true! I’m just the kind of person who tends to see things in black and white, so it bothers me a little when everyone can misuse a word and then it starts to mean that wrong thing… You’re totally right, though, I think it has and that section from dictionary.com kind of proves it.

      Like

  3. Haha! Great post, and great point. It’s like the word literally – so many people have started using it incorrectly that a dictionary entry has been added to make “figuratively” one of the definitions of literally. Equally frustrating!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Jordyn Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.